By surprise and one day in advance, as the vote was scheduled for Friday, the House passed yesterday afternoon in the bill CISPA. With a 248-168 vote in favor of and pending its passage by the Senate, the regulation is worse than writing a few days ago.Finally CISPA is a "blank check" for the government to act on data in the network of any city in the country.
And is that even a few hours ago the term "cyber security" was the basis of the proposal.Throughout the term the government could ask for and share private data with business users and third parties. ISPs and other companies operating in the network had access to each user's data and then report to government agencies or related companies upon request. A vagueness in the writings that during the past week debating the limits and uses.
Finally, it is much worse. The surprise vote yesterday followed the debate on the amendments, some of which were approved. Foremost, the definition of what the government can do with the information shared. No limit has been specified as it would limit the government's actions.
Surprising that it has voted a law one day in advance whose foundations were being discussed. Not only that, add a series of dangerous definitions.
CISPA previously allowed the government to use information across the term "cyber security" for "national security". The approved law is not only limited but have added three more uses:
Investigation and prosecution of cybercrime.Protection of persons.Protection of children.Although it may seem logical, adding "cyber crime" is defined in the literature as any crime involving interruption in the network, hacking or piracy in addition to any violation of the CFAA.
CISPA therefore misses the point by which he was born, the regulation that sought to "cyber-security," a mixture of the worst of SOUP with additions. Now the government would be able to find any information under CISPA without any citizen of the country have complete immunity or protection of privacy if it is argued that there is a "crime in cyber security."
With the law in their hands the Fourth Amendment would lose its status in the digital map and the government could do whatever he wants with the data whenever you can say that there is "danger".
With CISPA approved removes all privacy laws that are involved with technology in the network. A direct attack on the freedoms of users in the United States will now have to pass the Senate, when Mr. Obama may decide to veto or not.
If the Patriot Act gave full powers to the country on any citizen in the world covered by the term "terrorism", the U.S. government get with CISPA encompass everything that happens on the network. Internet already has "its" law in the U.S. and the last word has its president.
Fuente: Alt1040
--
By surprise and one day in advance, as the vote was scheduled for Friday, the House passed yesterday afternoon in the bill CISPA. With a 248-168 vote in favor of and pending its passage by the Senate, the regulation is worse than writing a few days ago.Finally CISPA is a "blank check" for the government to act on data in the network of any city in the country.
And is that even a few hours ago the term "cyber security" was the basis of the proposal.Throughout the term the government could ask for and share private data with business users and third parties. ISPs and other companies operating in the network had access to each user's data and then report to government agencies or related companies upon request. A vagueness in the writings that during the past week debating the limits and uses.
Finally, it is much worse. The surprise vote yesterday followed the debate on the amendments, some of which were approved. Foremost, the definition of what the government can do with the information shared. No limit has been specified as it would limit the government's actions.
Surprising that it has voted a law one day in advance whose foundations were being discussed. Not only that, add a series of dangerous definitions.
CISPA previously allowed the government to use information across the term "cyber security" for "national security". The approved law is not only limited but have added three more uses:
Investigation and prosecution of cybercrime.Protection of persons.Protection of children.Although it may seem logical, adding "cyber crime" is defined in the literature as any crime involving interruption in the network, hacking or piracy in addition to any violation of the CFAA.
CISPA therefore misses the point by which he was born, the regulation that sought to "cyber-security," a mixture of the worst of SOUP with additions. Now the government would be able to find any information under CISPA without any citizen of the country have complete immunity or protection of privacy if it is argued that there is a "crime in cyber security."
With the law in their hands the Fourth Amendment would lose its status in the digital map and the government could do whatever he wants with the data whenever you can say that there is "danger".
With CISPA approved removes all privacy laws that are involved with technology in the network. A direct attack on the freedoms of users in the United States will now have to pass the Senate, when Mr. Obama may decide to veto or not.
If the Patriot Act gave full powers to the country on any citizen in the world covered by the term "terrorism", the U.S. government get with CISPA encompass everything that happens on the network. Internet already has "its" law in the U.S. and the last word has its president.
Source: Alt1040
--
De surpresa e um dia de antecedência, como a votação foi marcada para sexta-feira, a Câmara aprovou ontem à tarde no CISPA conta. Com uma votação de 248-168 a favor e enquanto se aguarda a aprovação pelo Senado, o regulamento é pior do que escrever alguns dias atrás. Finalmente CISPA é um "cheque em branco" para o governo a agir sobre os dados na rede de qualquer cidade do país.
E é que até poucas horas atrás, o termo "segurança cibernética" foi a base da proposta. Ao longo da legislatura o governo poderia pedir e compartilhar dados privados com os usuários de negócios e de terceiros. ISPs e outras empresas que operam na rede teve acesso aos dados de cada usuário e, em seguida, relatar às agências governamentais ou empresas relacionadas, mediante solicitação. A imprecisão nos escritos que durante a semana passada a debater os limites e usos.
Finalmente, é muito pior. A votação surpresa ontem acompanhou o debate sobre as alterações, alguns dos quais foram aprovados. Em primeiro lugar, a definição de que o governo pode fazer com a informação compartilhada. Não há limite tenha sido especificado como seria limitar as ações do governo.
De estranhar que tenha votado uma lei um dia de antecedência, cujos fundamentos foram sendo discutido. Não só isso, adicionar uma série de definições perigosas.
CISPA previamente permitiu que o governo de usar as informações através do termo "segurança cibernética" para "segurança nacional". A lei aprovada não só é limitado, mas acrescentaram mais três usos:
Investigação e repressão dos crimes cibernéticos.Protecção das pessoas.Protecção das crianças.Embora possa parecer lógico, acrescentando que "cibercrime" é definida na literatura como qualquer crime envolvendo a interrupção da rede, hacking ou pirataria, além de qualquer violação da CFAA.
CISPA, portanto, perde o ponto em que ele nasceu, o regulamento que procurou "cyber-segurança", uma mistura do pior de sopa com adições. Agora, o governo seria capaz de encontrar qualquer informação sob CISPA sem qualquer cidadão do país gozam de completa imunidade ou protecção da privacidade se argumenta-se que há um "crime em segurança cibernética."
Com a lei em suas mãos a Quarta Emenda perderia seu status no mapa digital e que o governo poderia fazer o que quiser com os dados sempre que você pode dizer que há "perigo".
Com CISPA aprovado remove todas as leis de privacidade que estão envolvidos com a tecnologia na rede. Um ataque direto contra as liberdades de usuários nos Estados Unidos terá agora de passar no Senado, quando o Sr. Obama pode decidir vetar ou não.
Se o Patriot Act deu plenos poderes ao país qualquer cidadão do mundo abrangidas pelo termo "terrorismo", o governo dos EUA começa com CISPA abranger tudo o que acontece na rede. Internet já tem "sua" lei de os EUA ea última palavra tem o seu presidente.
Fonte: ALT1040
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario